Sunlight from the sun helps generate energy, but it is also a greenhouse gas and contributes to global warming.
So how much energy should people be putting into solar power?
This is a complex question that has become more complicated since a report released this week by the World Bank and the International Energy Agency.
The study found that the optimal amount of solar energy to put into the grid depends on the climate and the location of the sun.
The report recommends that people invest at least 10 percent of their income on solar panels and other energy storage.
That equates to spending $15,000 on solar energy per year, or about $100 per year.
But the report also found that households with incomes of $30,000 or less should invest less, because they can buy more expensive battery storage and solar panels at lower prices.
And even then, the optimal investment level depends on location.
If the panels are located in a residential area, such as a beach house or a garage, a family could save money by installing solar panels that are more efficient.
But that would require building a separate solar power system for every household.
And if they live in a small town or suburban area, it could be a challenge to buy more energy-efficient batteries for each household.
But if the panels and batteries are installed in more than one home, they could be cheaper.
For example, if a family in San Francisco installed solar panels in four homes, they would save $30 per year and still be able to pay off their electricity bill.
But it would take $30 in energy storage, which would also be more expensive than buying battery storage for each house.
Solar panels in an apartment building can be cheaper than battery storage, but the cost is still higher than for a typical home, the report found.
And it’s not clear how much solar energy a household should invest.
If a family spends $100 a year on energy storage and it saves the family $10 a year in electricity bills, then they could save $20 per year in savings.
But in reality, the cost of electricity in San Diego could be $3 a month, which is $40 more than the cost that households can save through solar energy.
So a family of four could be spending about $500 a year.
And the same family could have to pay $1,200 a year to have the same amount of energy storage as if it had bought battery storage.
In the future, the study recommends that solar power companies offer incentives to people who install solar panels.
The solar industry has said that it will offer incentives that are larger and more generous in the future.
But other energy-storage companies have said that they will not offer incentives for people to install energy storage systems.
The W.P.A. and the IEA report found that homeowners with incomes in the $30 million to $50 million range could save up to $3,000 per year on their electricity bills.
If that same family spends the same money on energy-capturing batteries, they will save $1.50 per year or about 40 cents a month.
But solar energy is not a household appliance.
If you have a solar panel and a battery, you could also install solar water heaters.
Both these types of solar panels can be installed in your home and cost $25 to $40 a year each.
And you could install solar hot water heatings and solar electric heaters for $5 a year, the W.I.A., in the study.
If solar energy were a household item, the savings would be even greater, because it would save you money for energy-related expenses, such for energy bills.
But, as the W, IEA, and the World Health Organization have said, solar energy does not come close to replacing energy-consuming appliances.
If people want to be energy-independent, they should not be relying on solar to do the job.
In fact, they are putting money in their pocket to invest in solar panels, batteries, and other devices that can store solar energy for later use.
If this information helps you, please consider helping The Washington Post’s Sustainable Energy Project by making a tax-deductible donation to help fund this project.